Quantitative Test Legal Definition

Quantitative Test Legal Definition

A study on drug abuse prevention in the workplace highlights the challenges associated with qualitative and quantitative approaches. Use as many sources of information as possible to get the best results. Collect and analyze qualitative and quantitative data to assess the strengths and areas for improvement in your workplace. Chemical drug testing is a more objective approach to assessing whether there is a problem with drug use in the workplace. For some workplaces, particularly where there are significant safety concerns, drug testing is required by law. In most workplaces, drug testing is optional. Testing can be done at different stages of the employment process – for example, for candidates or for those who are already employed. This can be done for specific groups such as safety-related positions or for all workers. Since there are costs associated with conducting drug testing, you cannot use this method for assessment. The study of statistical data becomes inevitable because of the far-reaching socio-economic dimensions, demographic factors and political implications of the operation of the law. Quantitative legal research (QLR) consists of a scientific measurement of phenomena and an appropriate generalization based on data analysis.

The growing importance of QLR can be found in the policy-making and implementation function of the legislature, judiciary and administration, as well as in the work of the Law Commission, policy researchers and lawyers. The design of QLR involves formulating research questions, formulating hypotheses, and testing the hypothesis against the statistical data collected. The sample size should be statistically appropriate and the collection, organization, presentation, analysis and interpretation of data in QLR should be systematic. The analysis of quantitative data by focusing on proportion, central tendency and deviation allows trends to be observed. Some societies use Oxford Academic`s personal accounts to provide access to their members. See below. A mathematical measure that determines the properties of an object. Our books are available by subscription or purchase in libraries and institutions. If your institution is not listed, or if you cannot log in to your institution`s website, please contact your librarian or administrator. A personal account can be used to receive email notifications, save searches, purchase content, and activate subscriptions. Typically, access to a range of IP addresses is provided through an institutional network. This authentication is automatic and you cannot log out of an IP-authenticated account.

Association members can access a journal in one of the following ways: Select this option to get remote access when you are away from your institution. Shibboleth/Open Athens technology is used to provide single sign-on between your institution`s website and Oxford Academic. Many companies offer single sign-on between the company`s website and Oxford Academic. If you see “Register on the Society`s website” in the registration section of a journal: Expert consultation can be extremely helpful in gaining a broader perspective on the issues you may face in your workplace. You should consult people who know your industry well, know your employees well, and are familiar with the issues associated with substance use in the workplace. These experts may include researchers, union representatives, Employee Assistance Program (EAP) representatives, or human resources experts from other companies. If you do not have a club account or have forgotten your username or password, please contact your club. Meetings can be an effective place to present and discuss drug-free policies and programs. Bringing up the topic during meetings can help anyone understand that a drug-free workplace affects the outcomes that matter to your employees in both professional and personal lives. In addition, you can clearly discuss the requirements of drug-free workplace laws or regulations that apply to your workplace. You can also use meetings to develop a policy and program that contributes to the well-being of your employees and workplace.

In the workplace, data collection from pre-existing datasets generally takes the form of statistics previously collected for other purposes. These are easy to obtain and compare. Consider records of the following, all of which have been linked to substance use: Access to content on Oxford Academic is often provided through subscriptions and institutional purchases. If you are a member of an institution with an active account, you may be able to access content in one of the following ways: Focus groups include a facilitator, supervisory and non-regulatory staff groups, and a predetermined set of questions. The facilitator structures interactions with group members by asking a series of agreed-upon questions and then following up on the answers if necessary. This allows for a thorough investigation of the issues. Some researchers use alcohol screening surveys. Two widely recognized alcohol screening tools are the World Health Organization`s Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test (AUDIT) and the CAGE questionnaire developed by researchers at the University of North Carolina.

Qualitative methods are a good place to start when you start your assessment. These methods can be helpful in describing a situation and providing insight into your intervention approach. Focus groups also allow for interaction between group members, which often stimulates further discussion and reveals unexpected problems and ideas. You can learn a lot by observing employees. However, keep in mind that behaviors can be altered by the act of observation. People tend to be more confident when they know they are under surveillance. In addition to training your supervisors to make observations, you should consult a professional trained to make objective and discreet observations in the workplace. Employees may under-report drug use for fear of discipline or job loss, despite guarantees of confidentiality and anonymity. Studies to detect alcoholism using the CAGE questionnaire and methods for assessing the prevalence of drug use in the workplace have raised concerns about the validity of self-reported drug and alcohol use. For librarians and administrators, your personal account also provides access to institutional account management.

Find options to view and activate subscriptions, manage institutional settings and access options, access usage statistics, and more. Oxford Academic is home to a variety of products. The institutional subscription may not cover the content you are trying to access. If you think you should have access to this content, please contact your librarian. When conducted by a trained and objective facilitator, one-on-one conversations often provide deeper knowledge and a more honest representation of a situation than other methods. The disadvantage of this approach is that it offers only one point of view. The experience of one person or a few people may not be the experience of the entire organization. However, information from one-on-one conversations can still provide useful information and help identify other issues that need further investigation.

Self-reported surveys can be used as assessment tools. Remember that investigations must be designed and managed properly to ensure an acceptable level of objectivity. To assess the needs and strengths of your workplace, you can ask the following questions from a 1996 survey by Gallup and the Institute for a Drug-Free Workplace: Powered by Black`s Law Dictionary, Free 2nd ed., and The Law Dictionary. Enter your library card number to sign in. If you are unable to log in, please contact your librarian. Quantitative methods are useful in that they often take less time than qualitative methods.